Daniel Murdock focuses his practice almost exclusively on construction and government contracting law. Mr. Murdock advises public and private owners as well as local, national and international contractors regarding contract negotiation, contract management, project execution, claim submittals and dispute resolution. He has extensive experience with various forms of alternate dispute resolution and claim litigation in various federal and state courts.

During law school, Mr. Murdock was selected as the 2006-2007 Most Outstanding Senior Editor of the Alabama Law Review. He was also a member of the Intellectual Property Moot Court team that won the national award for Best Brief, Best Oralists, and Best Overall Team at the 2007 Saul Lefkowitz National Moot Court Competition.

Professional & Community Activities

Freedom Writers, Mentor

Education

  • University of Alabama School of Law, J.D. (2007)

    cum laude

  • University of Alabama, B.A., Communications and Information Sciences (2003)

    magna cum laude

Bar Admissions

  • Georgia (2007)

Who We Are

What fully engaged means to me:

Promptly responding to the client's needs.

Suite 2800, 1100 Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA, 30309-4528
USA
t +1 404.815.6547
f +1 404.541.4603

Daniel M. Murdock

Experience Highlights

Contract dispute for mechanical subcontractor specializing in industrial piping fabrication and erection
Represent a mechanical subcontractor specializing in industrial piping fabrication and erection against a multinational General Works more
Project counsel for the City of Atlanta
Represented City of Atlanta concerning the design and construction of the $250 million facility for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. more
Counsel regarding design and construction for an international construction company
Represent a Georgia-based, international design and construction engineering company in connection with the design and construction more
Construction litigation for pipeline contractor
Represents a pipeline contractor in Texas state court against one of the largest pipeline owners in the United States arising out of a 135-mile more